Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:40

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
First-ever airborne toxin detected in Western Hemisphere - Phys.org
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What timeless pieces do you believe every wardrobe should possess?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
When a narcissist mad at their new supply, do they take it out on the old supply?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Instagram will finally let you rearrange your grid - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
4 Nutrients You Should Be Eating to Help Lower Dementia Risk, According to a New Study - EatingWell
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
'Heads of State' Review: John Cena & Idris Elba in Amazon Buddy Comedy - The Hollywood Reporter
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What do you think is the most powerful line in the song "Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien" by Édith Piaf?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
China-US Deal Didn’t Address Some Rare Earths Controls: Reuters - Bloomberg.com